Letters to Politicians


A letter regarding the proposed Ontario law to deny driver's licenses to anyone under 18 who is not actively in school.

	This is the letter I have sent to both the Ministry of Education and my
	local MPP (Willowdale -- davidzimmer.ca)  I know it doesn't encompass
	the broad range of homeschooling philosophies, but I felt that these
	were arguments that could be raised that outsiders could understand.  I
	understand there is much more to this issue, but I felt the points I
	addressed below might have the best chance of being well-taken by
	bureaucrats. (Plus, with my cross homeschool-gifted affiliations, I
	thought this might be a good route to take.)

	I'll let you know what, if anything, I hear back!   :)
	Sarah.
	---------------------------------------------

	I am writing to inquire as to the proposed legislation re: keeping kids
	in school until age 18.  I volunteer for provincial and local home
	schooling organizations, and everyone is wondering how this legislation
	will affect them.

	Currently, students who have withdrawn from the public school system are
	only required to notify their local school (or school board) of their
	intent to do so.  The school board is supposed to confirm receipt of
	this letter, but some never do.  Consequently, many families who are
	legally home schooling have no documentation to support this right that
	they have chosen to exercise.  Will, for example, membership in one of
	our provincial organizations qualify as a means to demonstrate that
	their children are actively "schooling"?  If not, then home schoolers
	very much need to know what other means can satisfy this schooling
	requirement to an external agency, for example, the Ministry of
	Transportation for a driver's license.

	Secondly, many home schoolers are able to accelerate their high school
	studies, and some finish their "high school" program in advance of being
	18 years old.  Again, since they are home schooling, they do not receive
	official confirmation of their graduation through an accredited
	diploma.  Rather, they and/or their parents have determined that they
	have completed the equivalent of a high school education.  This may
	involve non-credit experiences, such as self-study with commercial
	programs or affiliation with unaccredited content-delivery services.
	Since most students do not finish these types of program before the age
	of 16, this really hasn't been much of a concern under the current
	regulations.  But, many home schoolers are quite advanced with their
	studies, and yet, may not intend to continue on to post-secondary
	education right away.  With many of these students accomplishing their
	equivalent of a high school diploma before the age of 18, but no ties
	with the Ministry of Education to confer such accomplishment, what
	should these students do when faced with this current legislation?

	Thirdly, many home schoolers incorporate volunteer placements/job
	shadowing/mentoring or even study abroad exchanges or coop placements as
	part of their senior "high school" years, especially if their academic
	work has been completed.  Again, they are not under the jurisdiction of
	a local school board and cannot provide evidence of undergoing
	traditional schooling.  What should these students do to demonstrate
	they are not "drop outs"?

	In essence, these students are not traditional schoolers, and they do
	not have the same structures in place to authorize or rubber stamp their
	experiences. The homeschooling community is deeply interested in knowing
	how they will be represented and protected under this new legislation.

	Thank you sincerely for your time, and looking forward to your response,

	Sarah A. Rainsberger
	Executive Member,
	OFTP (Ontario Federation of Teaching Parents)

	Private School and Home School Liaison,
	EDGO-TAGO (Educators of the Gifted of Ontario - The Association for the
	Gifted of The Council for Exceptional Children for Ontario)
	

Home